Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Proceedings: A Study of Major Global Experiences

Authors

  • Prof. Dr. Rasha Alieldin Takieldin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59759/law.v5i2.1973

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Criminal Trial, Criminal Justice, Robot Judge, Digital Evidence, Predictive Justice, Judicial Decision-Making, Legal Liability, Algorithmic Bias, Data Protection, Smart Judicial Systems.

Abstract

 

This research examines the role of artificial intelligence in the development of criminal justice systems, focusing on its applications in criminal investigations, evidence collection, data analysis, and judicial decision-making. The study aims to assess the extent to which artificial intelligence enhances the efficiency, accuracy, and speed of criminal proceedings, while also identifying the legal and ethical challenges associated with its use, particularly algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, and the issue of legal liability for AI-generated decisions.

The research also explores key global experiences in the use of artificial intelligence in criminal trials, particularly in the United States, the European Union, and China. These jurisdictions have implemented AI systems for predictive analysis, evidence evaluation, risk assessment, and judicial decision support. In some cases, AI-powered virtual judges have been used in resolving minor legal disputes, reflecting the growing integration of AI into judicial systems.

The study adopts a comparative analytical approach to examine different legal frameworks and applications of artificial intelligence across jurisdictions. It also employs a descriptive and critical legal methodology to evaluate the regulatory and ethical implications of AI integration in criminal justice.

The research concludes that artificial intelligence represents a transformative tool capable of improving judicial efficiency, enhancing objectivity, and supporting judicial decision-making. However, its successful implementation requires a clear legal and regulatory framework that ensures transparency, accountability, and protection of fundamental rights. AI should serve as a supportive tool rather than a substitute for human judges, preserving the human dimension of justice and ensuring fair trial guarantees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B.M.CHEN, having your Day in Robot Court, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Volume 36, Number1, Fall 2022.

C.RUDIN & L.JACKSON, AI in Forensic Science: Challenges and Opportunities, International Journal of Organizational and Collective Intelligence, Volume 10, Issue 2, AprilـJune 2020, See at, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337057852_Digital_Forensics_Challenges_and_Opportunities_for_Future_Studies pdf, 2ـ3ـ2025.

C.RUDIN & L.JACKSON, Big Data and AI in Legal Analysis, Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 2021.

Ch.ENGEL and Others, Code is law: how COMPAS affects the way the judiciary handles the risk of recidivism, Artificial Intelligence and Law, See at, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506ـ024ـ09389ـ8, 23ـ2ـ2025.

Ch.OKOH, Robotic Judges: A Future to Desire or Not?, March 2023, See at, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4387301, 2ـ1ـ2025.

D.REILING, Courts and Artificial Intelligence, See at, https://www.ccbe.eu/fileadmin/speciality_distribution/public/documents/Events/20201027_Online_Roundtable/DoryـReilingـCourtـandـAI.pdf, 23ـ2ـ2025.

D.ROBINSON, The Challenges of Prediction: Lessons from Criminal Justice, A Journal of Law and Policy for The Information Society, Volume 12, Issue 2.

G.BRANDON & C.RUDIN, The Right to a Glass Box: Rethinking the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Criminal Justice, Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2023ـ03, See at, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4275661, 1ـ3ـ2025.

https://rossintelligence.com, 2ـ3ـ2025.

J.ANDERSON and Others, Autonomous Vehicle Technology, A Guide for Policymakers, See at, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR443ـ2.html, 21ـ2ـ2025.

J.MCCARTH & P.NORVIG, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson, 2020.

K.D. ASHLEY, Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals in HYPO, International Journal of ManـMachine Studies, Volume 34, Issue 6, June 1991.

K.YEUNG & A.HOWES, AI in Legal Research and Decision Making, Harvard Law Review, 2022.

K.YEUNG and Others, AI Governance by Human Rights CentredـDesign, Deliberation and Oversight: An End to Ethics Washing. In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI Oxford University Press.

L.MOSES & J.CHAN, Algorithmic prediction in policing: Assumptions, evaluation, and accountability, Policing and Society, Volume 29, Issue 7, 2018.

M.SCHERER, Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Volume 29, Number 2 Spring 2016.

R.ASSMUS and Others, ROSS AI Decision Gives Early Indication of Strengths and Weaknesses of Fair Use Defense, https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/02/rossـaiـdecisionـgivesـearlyـindicationـofـstrengthsـandـweaknessesـofـfairـuseـdefense, 10ـ2ـ2025.

R.SUSSKIND, Online Courts and the Future of Justice, Oxford University Press, 2020, P.18.

R.SUSSKIND, The Future of Law and AI in Criminal Justice, Oxford University Press, 2021, P.30.

S.CHESTERMAN, All Rise for the Honourable Robot Judge? Using Artificial Intelligence to Regulate AI, NUS Law Working Paper No 2022/019, October 2022, See at, https://law.nus.edu.sg/wpـcontent/uploads/2022/10/019_SimonChesterman.pdf, 1ـ3ـ2025.

S.GOODISON and Others, Autonomous Road Vehicles and Law Enforcement, RAND Corporation, 2017, P.1, See at, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA108ـ4.html, 2ـ2ـ2025.

S.Koehler M.Pasupuleti, Research on the Court Decide: The Implications of Artificial Intelligence, Volume 5, Number 1, 2020, See at, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380711194_Research_on_the_Court_Decide_The_Implications_of_Artificial_Intelligence, 3ـ3ـ2025.

S.RUSSELL & P.NORVIG, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, University of California at Berkeley, 4th edition.

T.Vasdani, Robot justice: China’s use of Internet courts, See at, https://www.lexisnexis.ca/enـca/ihc/2020ـ02/robotـjusticeـchinasـuseـofـinternetـcourts.page, 12ـ2ـ2025.

ثالثًا: مواقع الإنترنت:

Artificial Intelligence Strategy, Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ), See at, https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023ـ11/cjeu_ai_strategy.pdf, 20ـ2ـ2025.

China Focus: China's local judicial systems embrace AI to improve efficiency, See at, https://english.news.cn/20241231/b6a8ba8914824c3f83cfa11df040e2af/c.html, 30ـ1ـ2025.

https://aiـwatch.github.io/AIـwatchـT6ـX/service/90142.html, 3ـ2ـ2025.

https://artificialintelligenceact.eu, 21ـ2ـ2025.

https://counciloncj.org/theـimplicationsـofـaiـforـcriminalـjustice/, 1ـ3ـ2025.

https://doc.shanghaiopen.org.cn/case/16/en_2.html, 2ـ1ـ202025.

https://donotpay.com, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/westlaw, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://penal.org/sites/default/files/files/Aـ12ـ2023.pdf, 30ـ1ـ2025.

https://politicalـencyclopedia.org/dictionary/العدالة%20التنبؤية, 25ـ1ـ2025.

https://precog.com, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://rasa.com, 2ـ3ـ2025.

https://www.almamlakatv.com/news/100508ـ, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.bluejlegal.com, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.bluejlegal.com, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/cepejـeuropeanـethicalـcharterـonـtheـuseـofـartificialـintelligenceـaiـinـjudicialـsystemsـandـtheirـenvironment, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.cybersettle.com and https://www.smartsettle.com.

https://www.epiqglobal.com/enـus/resourceـcenter/articles/futureـofـblockchainـandـediscovery, 3ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.judicata.com, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.legalzoom.com/country/kw and https://www.ftc.gov/legalـlibrary/browse/casesـproceedings/donotpay.

https://www.lexisnexis.com/enـus/products/legalـanalytics, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.luminance.com, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.met.police.uk/policeـforces/metropolitanـpolice/areas/aboutـus/aboutـtheـmet/gangsـviolenceـmatrix, 1ـ1ـ2025.

https://www.modee.gov.jo, 4ـ1ـ2025.

https://www.moj.gov.sa/Documents/ManualForRemoteLitigationV2.pdf, 9ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.okaz.com.sa/local/na/1730530, 9ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.wam.ae/ar/article/b5q8oaoـالنيابةـالعامةـتطورـمنظومةـعملـمدعومةـبالذكاء, 2ـ2ـ2025.

https://www.youm7.com/story/2024/9/20/طفرةـبمنظومةـالتقاضىـعبرـاستخدامـالذكاءـالاصطناعىـفىـالمحاكم/6711793, 2ـ2ـ2025.

www.ravellaw.com, 2ـ2

Published

2026-07-26

How to Cite

Takieldin, P. D. R. A. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Proceedings: A Study of Major Global Experiences. Political Sciences and Law Series, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.59759/law.v5i2.1973