Exploring Relationships between Learner Readiness and Dialogue in Online English Language Courses at Al al-Bayt University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59759/educational.v5i2.1523الكلمات المفتاحية:
: Learners’ readiness, Dialogueالملخص
Designing successful online courses requires an understanding of how students behave when learning online. It is crucial to realize that the learning process has significant effects on the psycho-educational framework for online learning. Consequently, Learners’ readiness is necessary for the experiences and actions learners will practice in the online learning to be realized. In social constructivism, dialogue as a series of interactions enhance knowledge acquisition. Among these requirements, this study aimed to explore the relationships of online learners’ readiness and dialogue, to provide administrators at Al al-Bayt University with feedback. Data were collected from learners’ participation in English language course (101) in academic year 2020-2021second semester. 992 students from 35 online sections made up of the population. The sample, which consisted of four sections with 293 learners and an 89% return rate (261 returned), was selected at random. The data were analyzed using Smart PLS 3.0 to test the hypothesizes influence of Learners’ readiness construct on dialogue in online learning. The results provided confirmation of a five-dimension measurement model for Learners’ readiness and provided confirmation of a three-dimension measurement model for dialogue, moreover, the findings indicate that R positively and significantly affects D (β = 0.757, t = 16.283, p <.01).
التنزيلات
المراجع
Alkış, N., & Taşkaya Temizel, T. (2018). The impact of motivation and personality on academic performance in online and blended learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 35–47.
Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality. In L. Pervin & O. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). Guilford Press.
Bonk, C. J., & Kim, K.-A. (1998). Extending sociocultural theory to adult learning. In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 67–88). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Burgess, R. G. (2006). In the field: An introduction to field research. Routledge.
Burgess, T. F., Senior, B., & Moores, T. (2010). Exploring the relationship between strategy and human resource management in the UK retail sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(11), 1935–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.505899
Chang, W. C., Chan, G. H. K., Jim, O. T. T., Lau, E. S. K., Hui, C. L. M., Chan, S. K. W., Lee, E. H. M., & Chen, E. Y. H. (2015). Optimal duration of an early intervention programme for first-episode psychosis: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 206(6), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.114.150144
Chou, P.-N., Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-H. (2020). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 146, 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103770
Cigdem, H., & Ozturk, M. (2016). Factors affecting students’ behavioral intention to use LMS at a Turkish post-secondary vocational school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2253
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Fırat, M., & Bozkurt, A. (2020). Variables affecting online learning readiness in distance education. Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1–14.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Horzum, M. B. (2013). Interaction, structure, social presence, and satisfaction in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 172–182.
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
Kim, K.-S., & Moore, J. L. (2005). Web–based learning: Factors affecting students’ satisfaction and learning experience. First Monday, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v10i11.1294
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Mashakbh, A. F. (2016). Online individualized multimedia instructional model for engineering communication skills [Thesis, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia]. UKM Institutional Repository. https://ptsldigital.ukm.my/jspui/handle/123456789/487818
Mayer, R. E. (2007). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mirķe, E., Cakula, S., & Tzivian, L. (2019). Measuring teachers-as-learners’ digital skills and readiness to study online for successful e-learning experience. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 21(2), 5–16.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–29). Routledge.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth Publishing.
Östlund, B. (2008). Participation in online education: A study of the role of student characteristics. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390701847447
Preckel, F., Götz, T., & Frenzel, A. (2010). Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self-concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X480716
Raub, P. (2020). Attitude as mediator of technical usage self-efficacy, online communication self-efficacy, technology access and online media on the blended learning readiness.
Şahin, M., Tuncer, M., & Yılmaz, F. (2018). The effect of students’ readiness for e-learning on their interaction and satisfaction. Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 225–238.
Smith, J. D., Couchman, J. J., & Beran, M. J. (2014). The highs and lows of theoretical interpretation in animal-metacognition research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1655), 20140176. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0176
Taipjutorus, W., Hansen, S., & Brown, M. (2012). Investigating a model of student retention in online education: The role of motivation, self-regulation, and support. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 16(1), 56–69.
Taşkın, N., & Erzurumlu, K. (2021). Investigation into online learning readiness: Development and validation of a measurement tool. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-1-1
Yeşilyurt, F. (2021). The learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and university students’ perceptions. [Unpublished manuscript].
