A Content Analysis of the Extent of Using Feminine Representation in the Action Pack 9 Student's Book Textbook

Authors

  • Hiba Al-Majali Ministry of education- Jordan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59759/educational.v3i4.846

Keywords:

Action Pack, feminine, content analysis

Abstract

      The present research aims at examining the extent of using feminine representation in the Action Pack 9 Student's Book Textbook. The researcher proposed one question to be answered " to what extent does the Action Pack 9 student's book textbook use the feminine representation in terms of pictures, proper nouns, texts or terms?"

      A content analysis is carried out in search of pictures, terms, texts and proper nouns that represent females in the chosen textbook. A table that shows the categories, frequencies and percentages has been presented and discussed. The results have revealed that the Action Pack 9 student's book textbook does not include a sufficient feminine representation and the researcher has suggested few recommendations. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

 Ahmad Shawish, L. (2022). A Content Analysis of the Speaking Skill Authenticity in Student’s Book of Action Pack Seven in Jordan. مجلة کلية التربية (أسيوط), 38(8.2), 1-23.‎

 Al-Ghazo, A., & MSmadi, O. (2013). A content analysis of the English reading text's authenticity in student's book of action pack eleven in Jordan. European Scientific Journal, 9(29).

 Allwright, R. L. (1990). What do we want teaching materials for? In R. Rossner and R. Bolitho, (Eds.), Currents in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

 Arthur, R., & Fenyi, D. A. (2023). Gender Representation in Classroom Discourse: A Study of School-Related Gender-Based Violence in Selected Colleges of Education in Ghana.

 Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research.

 Blumberg, R. L. (2008). The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects, 38, 345-361. Chicago

 Fahik, T. (2020). English Textbook: A Culture-Based Analysis. Lingua Scentia, 27(1), 55–64.

 Gebregeorgis, M. Y. (2016). Gender Construction Through Textbooks: The Case of an Ethiopian Primary School English Textbook. Africa Education Review, 13(3–4), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1224579

 Grauerholz, E., & Pescosolido, B. A. (1989). Gender representation in children's literature: 1900-1984. Gender & Society, 3(1), 113-125.

 Hamdan, S. (2010). English-language textbooks reflect gender bias: A case study in Jordan. Advances in Gender and Education, 2(2), 22-26.

 Hamdan, S., & Jalabneh, A. (2009). Topics in EFL textbooks and the question of gender dominance: A case study from public schools of Jordan. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 28, 52-56.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/appropriateness

 Kashima, Y. (2014). How can you capture cultural dynamics?. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 105723.

 Lee, J. and Collins, P. (2008). Gender Voices in Hong Kong English Textbooks—Some Past and Current Practices. Sex Roles. 59, 127–137.

 Mihira, L. S. N. (2022). The Deconstruction of Gender Stereotype in Indonesian English Textbook for The Eleventh Grade of Senior High School. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

 Ministry of Education, Statistical report for the academic year (2018/2019)

 Nofal, M. Y., & Qawar, H. A. (2015). Gender representation in English language textbooks: Action pack 10. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 14-18.

 Palmquist, M.(1990).Content Analysis. Retrieved on April 30,2013 available at http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/writingCenter/references/search/content/ page2.htm

 Paudel, J., & Khadka, P. (2019). Analysis of an English textbook from a feminist perspective. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 6(9), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0609002

 Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL quarterly, 18(4), 705-724.

 Queen Rania Foundation, QRF FACT SHEET (2018)

 Sana’M, A. S., Bataineh, R. F., & AlHawamdeh, M. F. A Content Analysis of the Pronunciation and Spelling Activities in Action Pack Ten.

 United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Institute for Statistics. (2017). School enrollment, primary (gross), gender parity index (GPI). World Bank Data.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ENR.PRIM.FM.ZS?locations=JO

 Yasamahadewi, P., Suwastini, N. K. A., & Suarcaya, P. (2023). Deconstruction of Gendered Dialogues in English Language Students Textbook for Grade 12 Senior High School. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(3), 440-458.

 Yonata, F., & Mujiyanto, Y. (2017). The representation of gender in English textbooks in Indonesia. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 12(1), 91-102.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Al-Majali, H. (2024). A Content Analysis of the Extent of Using Feminine Representation in the Action Pack 9 Student’s Book Textbook. Educational and Psychological Sciences Series, 3(4), 1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.59759/educational.v3i4.846