Political Sciences and Law Series

The Crisis of the Israeli Embassy in Amman 23/July/2017AD - 18/January/2018 AD (The Political Environment and the Diplomacy of Dealing)

2024-09-11T09:42:22+02:00

The study aimed to examine the crisis of the Israeli embassy in Amman, as a model that embodies the state of tension that has become a dominant feature of Jordanian-Israeli relations despite the signing of a peace treaty since 1994. The crisis was addressed in terms of its nature, the extent to which it is affected by the surrounding Jordanian-Israeli political environment, and the two sides' approach to dealing with it. It was found that the crisis arose from an ordinary criminal incident that did not have any political dimensions, which could have been contained within the legal frameworks followed between countries, without affecting the political relations. However, it soon developed into a serious political crisis, due to the Israeli government's provocative and intransigent policy in dealing with it, which confirms its lack of credibility in finding real peace with Jordan.

The Demand to Cassation in the Jordanian Legislation

2024-09-11T09:51:56+02:00

The demand to cassation is a procedure that aims at referring appellate provisions that are not subject to appeal to the Court of Cassation; some regulations of appellate provisions are directly subject to appeal, while others can only be appealed through permission to cassation. The study aims to understand the nature of permission to cassation, its reasons, and the accuracy of the legislator in regulating this issue. The main problem of the study lies in the lack of precision in the legal texts regulating the issue of demanding permission to cassation procedurally, as well as the legislation suffering from deficiencies and confusion in regulating the issue of reviewing as the most important consequence of the decision issued in response to the demand for cassation in form. The study concluded that the legal texts regulating this issue are deficient and not precise, and that it is necessary to amend the legal texts regulating
the demand to cassation , most importantly amending articles (191) and (204) of the Civil Procedure Code to make the procedures and deadlines for demanding cassation clear and specific.‏

The Legislative Drafting of Sources of Judicial Ruling in the Jordanian Personal Status Law No. 15 of 2019

2024-09-11T09:56:20+02:00

This study aims to evaluate the legislative drafting of the original and subsidiary sources of judicial ruling in the Jordanian Personal Status Law No. 15 for 2019, in terms of its adequacy to accommodate life variable and developments related to personal status, and the extent of its commitment to the tight drafting that keeps the legal basis away from the possibilities that lead to confusion in rulings due to the differences in explaining them, supported by applied examples. The study followed the descriptive approach, the deductive approach, and the comparative approach, as it compared the legislative wording of Jordanian law with a number of civil laws and personal status laws in the Arab world. The study reached a number of results and presented some recommendations to the Jordanian legislator related to the subject, the most important of which is that there is no reason to consider the preponderant opinion of Abu Hanifa creed the second source for the law, and present it over the rulings of the Islamic jurisprudence, since they may not be the most likely to agree with law provisions. Also, The preponderant opinion of Abu Hanifa creed is related to the rulings of the Islamic jurisprudence, but not the other way around.